The Ying Yang Twins on Uptight Assholes, Gays, the Ideal Woman, and Why They Speak for Strippers

Photo: pho­to­bucket

By ANNIE ATURA

April 28, 2010

The fol­low­ing inter­view is unedited. It took place at seven o’clock on April 27, 2010 in the Bran­ford Col­lege Master’s House, min­utes before the Ying Yang Twins took the stage at Spring Fling. When I entered, there was a mas­sive spread of cater­ing from Popeye’s on the din­ing room table. Yang was on the couch in the fetal posi­tion; he par­tic­i­pated in the first part of the inter­view supine. Upon Ying’s arrival – he had been tour­ing Bran­ford with Mas­ter Steven Smith – Yang sat up. The inter­view was made pos­si­ble by WYBC Yale Radio.

Annie Atura: So which one are you? Ying or Yang?

Yang: Yang.

AA: So what’s the dif­fer­ence? Do you com­plete each other?

Yang: Yeah. My brother’s more of the peace; I’m more of the war.

AA: So do you have any feel­ings about Yale? Edu­ca­tion in general?

Yang: We all need an edu­ca­tion.  That’s the feel­ing I have about it. As far as col­lege, or any­thing like that, I never really got into that. My main goal was to just get out of high school. I ain’t never really plan no col­lege or any­thing.  I don’t want to waste my own smarts. Because my fam­ily sure ain’t have no damn money to send me to col­lege. So my main accom­plish­ment was just to get a diploma. ‘Cause nowa­days, you ain’t got no diploma you can’t even work at McDonald’s, dammit!

AA: What did your par­ents do?

Yang: Um, shit. My dad painted cars before I was born, and still paint cars. My mom at home. She don’t really have no choice. So now I take care of ‘em.

AA: Are you aware that there was con­tro­versy sur­round­ing the Ying Yang Twins’ com­ing here?

Yang: There usu­ally always is when we go to any college.

AA: Really? Why?

Yang: Peo­ple always – sen­si­tive peo­ple, you know what I’m say­ing, they don’t like cer­tain stuff. You’re never going to get every­body to like every­thing. But the main thing that peo­ple have to real­ize when they – uh – pull those type of moves toward the Ying Yang Twins: we are the people’s favorite rap group. So we’re just like, all that other, uh, how do you say, um, when they try to start, that shit ain’t gonna work with the Ying Yang Twins. We pro­vide a fun feel­ing. And then, how many other peo­ple in the world you think par­ents didn’t like the music they lis­tened to. It ain’t just the Ying Yang Twins. Peo­ple, the older peo­ple, like your par­ents or grand­par­ents, who­ever lis­tened to every per­son that their par­ents couldn’t like every per­son, you know what I’m say­ing. Every­thing is a reen­act­ment, over and over. But the thing that peo­ple have to real­ize is that every­body ain’t an uptight asshole.

AA: Well, do you think that your music is misogynistic?

Yang: Um … No. Because we make songs, we let it be known that we make songs for exotic dancers. You know, once we came out. So any­body that was against that, I look at it like this: if you’re not a strip­per, if you don’t work at a nudie bar, then you ain’t really have a point to try to make a point against us. Because the same women that you might not be fond of if they work in exotic bars, they’ve got the same type of sit­u­a­tion we all have. Peo­ple have to take care of them­selves. I don’t know any­body that lives any­where in this nation or any­where in the world that can live off love. Money pays bills. Every­body ain’t going to like every­thing. I already know that, so I’m ready for the worst. They call me Mr. Worst First any­where I go.  You can’t really – you can’t make me see a closed door. A per­son that has some­thing to say deroga­tory every time – although we have deroga­tory lyrics – in the sit­u­a­tions that we rep­re­sent, to those women, the lyrics are not deroga­tory. They are help­ful.

AA: So: “For real bitch / Don’t take this shit wrong / Think­ing I’m nice / I’ll break your jaw­bone:” that’s some­thing that they would con­sider helpful?

Yang: I mean, it all goes along with what we promote.

AA: Well what exactly do you promote?

Yang: Um … We, our main objec­tive as the Ying Yang Twins was to make hype songs for women that work in the strip club.

AA: So things that they could get excited about?

Yang: Yeah, ver­sus let­ting them dance to fuck­ing John Cougar Mellencamp.

AA: Mm hm.

Yang: Or Pink Floyd. You know what I’m saying?

AA: So you think women can get excited about things like, “Fuck you til you cry”?

Yang: Right! Because a lot of the women that know us – the women that work in the exotic clubs – and other women that don’t work in the club, they say, You  guys know how to explain, when you talk about us. So, when you make the lit­tle ges­ture about the bitch here, or, trick, or ho there, it’s not as bad as a illit­er­ate per­son try­ing to use the same type of lyrics. In other words, you have to have smarts, in order to get smart with a person.

AA: So you think that you actu­ally empathize with women?

Yang: Yeah. That’s right.

AA: How much time do you actu­ally spend in strip clubs?

Yang: Um, that’s our whole career. Like, just like, all right, I’ll put it to you like this. Every­thing we’ve accom­plished over the years we’ve been the Ying Yang Twins, since 1997, all right, over the years, it’s not any type of per­for­mance we won’t do. We do squeaky clean shows, we do X rated shows, that’s why every time we come to a col­lege we ask what do they pre­fer. You know what I’m say­ing? We already know the stacked deck gonna be up against us but when, we’re not one of those groups that you’re going to be able to just – uh uh uh – down­play. You know why? What is this, New Haven, Con­necti­cut, right? We’ve been at Spring Bling [sic] before, and kids, they be like, We drove all the way from Con­necti­cut, lis­ten­ing to noth­ing but the Ying Yang Twins! So, you know, far as cer­tain peo­ple not lik­ing what you do, you know you ain’t never going to get every­one to like you. So what?

Ying: Well I don’t mean to come in, rude and everything,

AA: No, please!

Ying: But uh, they say we was at Yale. I thought all the deaf peo­ple was here ’cause they said Yale. Laughs.

AA: So what is it exactly that draws you to strip clubs?

Yang: Strip clubs – if you ain’t never been to Atlanta, there’s a lot of clubs all over this nation, but we have the best. They get all the way naked.

Ying: You say what dri­ves us to strip clubs?

AA: Yes, right, he was talk­ing about how much he enjoyed strip clubs –-

Yang: Right.

AA: — and how you make a lot of music for the women that work in strip clubs.

Ying: What do women do in the strip clubs? That’s what draws us there! They ain’t got on no under­wear! Where your under­clothes at! My bad, my bad! My bad, baby!

AA: So describe your ideal woman?

Yang: Ideal woman, what do you mean?

AA: I don’t know. To mate with.

Ying: Cool. Down to earth. Smoke. Drink.

Yang: Lady in the street but a freak in the bed.

AA: Really? That’s your ideal?

Yang: I mean, yeah. When I say lady I mean in every aspect of the word.  Uh uh uh uh.

Ying: I guess my ideal woman is my wife.

AA: Would you date an exotic dancer?

Yang: No.

AA: Why? Why not?

Yang: Why? ‘Cause she gets paid to pro­vide a ser­vice that requires a cer­tain – uh uh uh uh um – sen­si­tive sit­u­a­tion, how I look at it. When someone’s together and they be inti­mate, that’s a pri­vate thing right? Ok. So that’s sacred, whether you be mar­ried or not. But if they got a club that I can go – now, say if I’m try­ing to talk to this lady. It take me six months to a year for her to get com­fort­able with me. But if she work in the club, I ain’t got to talk to her.

Ying: Takes her six­teen seconds.

Yang: Five or six minutes.

AA: And that’s unat­trac­tive to you?

Yang: Um, it’s not actually –

Ying: No no I’m not say­ing it’s unat­trac­tive. But if she’s doing that to me or him or him, how many other men within a day is she doing that to? So if you cal­cu­late that within the week, and then you cal­cu­late that within the month, and then you cal­cu­late that within the year – I don’t want my wife, or any­body who that I feel like this is my soul mate, out there show­ing my good­ies, my good­ies, my good­ies not my good­ies, you know what I’m saying?

Yang: The exchange rate is get­ting to know a per­son ver­sus giv­ing them a cou­ple of dol­lars to take their clothes off.

Ying: Do you want your man show­ing off all your goodies?

AA: Well, it depends, right? I also don’t go to strip clubs.

Ying: Would you date a strip­per? Would you date a male stripper?

AA: Well I don’t go to male strip clubs.

Ying: But would you date a male strip­per? Even if you don’t go, even though you igno­rant to the point that you don’t go, would you date a male stripper?

AA: Yes. Yes I would.

Ying: So you cool with a lot of other women look­ing at your goodies.

AA: Yeah.

Ying: No, for me it’s only me, myself, and I.

AA: How much of your day do you spend naked?

Ying: Say what?

AA: How much of your day do you spend naked?

Yang: It all depends on how long you want to be naked.

Ying: I’m just say­ing though how many peo­ple am I show­ing it to in a day?

AA: I don’t know, how many peo­ple are you show­ing it to in a day?

Ying: I’m not. I ain’t show­ing it to nobody but me myself and my wife, you know. I don’t even show my home­boys myself like that, you know. So to show some­body else –

AA: How do you feel about things like gay mar­riage? Are you com­fort­able with homosexuality?

Yang: No. I’m not with that.

Ying: No, I’m not with that.

AA: You’re not with that?

Yang: Oppo­sites attract. That shit is a no-go with me. You know I mean, straight up. The female was made for the man, the man was made for the female, and that’s how that shit’s sup­posed to go. All together. There ain’t no way around that shit. You can’t – two of the same moth­er­fuck­ers can’t repro­duce, so that don’t help the world.

Ying: Well I’m not gay and I don’t, um, involve my cir­cle, I’m cool, what­ever you do, that’s your life. I have noth­ing against it.

Yang: I respect gays, ’cause most fam­i­lies have one in their fam­ily. I respect them. As far as being with that shit? No.

AA: Do you think they should be allowed to marry?

Yang: I don’t see it.

Ying: Uhhh – by by by by bib­li­cal law –

AA: Are you religious?

Yang: Reli­gious is noth­ing but a pawn of slavery.

Ying: No I’m just say­ing, bib­li­cal law, it’s not sup­posed to go on. So human law it’s cool. I’m just say­ing at the end of the day, that per­son who’s plan­ning to get mar­ried and do what­ever they have to do to the oppo­site sex – I mean the same sex – they have to face the Maker at the end of the day. We don’t. So bib­li­cally we have noth­ing to do with that.

AA: So you’re reli­gious (Ying) and you aren’t (Yang)?

Ying: No I’m just say­ing that’s just the way it goes.

Yang: I don’t choose a religion.

Ying: Bib­li­cally, it’s not sup­posed to go on. But by man laws, since ten years ago, it’s cool to go around and say I’m gay. Ten years ago you couldn’t do it. It was like, you say, I’m gay, and some­one almost would whoop ya.

Yang: There’s some sen­si­tive peo­ple in this world just like the peo­ple in Cal­i­for­nia. All that shit trick­les down.

Ying: Ok, ok. When do laws change?

Yang: All the time.

Ying: Laws change when gays become part of politics.

Yang: Laws change all the time, shorty.

Ying: They change every day, that’s what I’m say­ing. So now that you’ve got more gays in the law­mak­ing deci­sion, damn right, it’s cool now.

Yang: I still don’t feel like that.

Ying: Shit. Really? Really if you want to tell the truth about it, bib­li­cally, they’ve been gay since the begin­ning of time! They just was keep­ing it in the closet.

Yang: They been Romans doing that shit.

Ying: Come on, there’s more priests and preach­ers that mess with lit­tle boys than we even fail to acknowl­edge. But we don’t want to acknowl­edge that. We done swept that up under the table. All right, let’s talk about these gays and homo­sex­u­als we got going on right now, but we ain’t going to talk about that priest that was mess­ing with young Bobby when lit­tle Bobby was too young to know what was going on.

Yang: It’s like this, if you gonna point the fin­ger at one thing you gotta point the fin­ger at everything.

Ying: At every­thing. It’s been going on long before us.

Yang: Yeah so don’t try to. Like a lot of peo­ple try to take that shit and apply it wher­ever someone’s a lit­tle rougher than they would like.

Ying: Lit­tle Bobby try to build his life around – I’m not this way I’m not this way I’m not this way I’m not this way – and he try to build his life around that until when he try to face the way he is, he has to buckle his knees like a wimpy lit­tle girl. To the per­son that’s not even higher than him. He done have a child, he done mar­ried, he done do every­thing that he think that in G-d’s eyes is for him to do. And that’s why I’m like, why are you sit­ting around here mak­ing like it’s not ok to do this it’s not ok to do this, but when some­one else come out and say, Well I’ve done it, that’s close to you, you like, Well I was like that too! I just didn’t really want to say noth­ing. For what?

Yang: Well you know like peo­ple like, that wait ‘til some­body else start some­thing before they say some­thing, those are bitches.

Ying: If you like penis, say you like penis. If you like kitty cat, say you like kitty cat.

Yang: With me? I’m not as sen­si­tive as the world is. I’m not G-d, I’m not Jesus, and I’m not that sen­si­tive, because there’s some ugly shit that occurs in the world every day. And we still be forced to have a look at it and deal with it.

Annie Atura is a junior in Yale Col­lege. She is a staff writer for Broad Recog­ni­tion.

Cor­rec­tion: The ini­tial tran­script of this inter­view used the infor­mal spellings “cuz” and “ax.” For the sake of con­sis­tency, the revised tran­script uses “’cause” instead of “cuz” and “ask” instead of “ax.”

Bookmark and Share Email

Comments

29 Responses to “The Ying Yang Twins on Uptight Assholes, Gays, the Ideal Woman, and Why They Speak for Strippers”
  1. In retrospect says:

    After read­ing this inter­view I real­ize I was not out­raged enough that Yale brought the Ying Yang Twins to Spring Fling.

  2. Really? says:

    Ax?” You really felt like that was appro­pri­ate? You write out every sin­gle “some­thing,” “noth­ing,” and even “moth­er­fuck­ers,” all of which would dialec­ti­cally not be said as such by the Twins (I’ve seen var­i­ous inter­views with them)…yet you choose to write “ax” instead of “ask?” I am not one to eas­ily pull out the race card, but man are you tread­ing a line. I also love that you noted that the cater­ing was from Popeye’s (are you sure it wasn’t KFC?). I won­der if Sub­way had catered for the Twins if that fun lit­tle fact would have made it into your story. I still won­der how their food was rel­e­vant to the piece aside from your attempts to imme­di­ately cast them in a role.
    It’s off-putting that inter­view was clearly approached with a slant rather than an open con­ver­sa­tion with an attempt to rec­og­nize who these peo­ple are and where they come from.

    • Hmm says:

      I was actu­ally impressed by the interviewer’s restraint and impar­tial­ity. In an “unedited” tran­scrip­tion, judg­ment calls for spelling must be made, and she drew her edi­to­r­ial line some­where else from where you might have. And the chicken was Popeye’s. If you’re a fan of the Ying Yang Twins, stand by what they’ve said and who they are, don’t attack the inter­viewer with hol­low claims of racism and bias that reveal more about your own ideas of what is and isn’t a racial stereotype.

      • Really? says:

        Your jour­nal­is­tic bar is set too low for my lik­ing. Her judg­ment calls were incon­sis­tent and illus­tra­tive of bias, as were some her ques­tion and word choices.

        I am glad Annie has so many friends, the sup­port net­work will really help when she can’t get a jour­nal­ism job (if she’s not going into I-banking).

  3. Really? says:

    Seems like you real­ized this too, as the arti­cle has now been changed. What a chickensh*t move.

  4. Aaron says:

    I agree with “Really?”–even with the revi­sion, it was clear that the quo­ta­tions were tran­scribed with an unnec­es­sary con­cern for cap­tur­ing every poor par­ti­cle of speech. Mak­ing the ying yang twins look as stu­pid as they are is easy enough, includ­ing their every “um” and “erm” was a frus­trat­ing tac­tic to read through that read like an edi­to­ri­al­iz­ing rather than accu­rate quoting.

    • Hmm says:

      I’m pretty sure the only one mak­ing the leap from “poor par­ti­cles of speech” to the twins look­ing stu­pid is you. The first sen­tence says the inter­view is unedited, mean­ing tran­scribed as faith­fully as pos­si­ble. Assign­ing biases to an admirably impar­tial inter­viewer reveals more about your own prej­u­dices than about hers.

  5. Avinash Gandhi says:

    There are many ways to inter­pret what these men have said, not least because their Eng­lish is ques­tion­able. It’s great, how­ever, to see that they are self aware, and I choose to believe that there is some wis­dom in what they’re say­ing, even if not every­one can see it.

  6. Aaron says:

    re: avinash

    no, that’s wrong

  7. they really were eating popeye's says:

    i saw the ycc mem­ber who was bring­ing them cater­ing and it was popeye’s. it was a very large order of popeye’s. fact.

  8. Ying says:

    Ying Yang in this thang!!!!

  9. bob the builder says:

    AA, would you really date a male strip­per? Even if it would prove some noble point about the value of every human being irre­spec­tive of the fact that they choose to objec­tify them­selves for a liv­ing? How would your proud Yale par­ents feel about that?

  10. Y10 says:

    1. Whats wrong with point­ing out that the food came Popeyes and try­ing to ortho­graph­i­cally express the African Amer­i­can dialect? Black cul­ture is black cul­ture. Try­ing to pre­tend like we didn’t notice it or that it isn’t there is more racist than hon­estly acknowl­edg­ing it. If you think that eat­ing at Popeyes or speak­ing in a cer­tain dialect is a neg­a­tive qual­ity, then what does that say about what YOU think of those peo­ple? Seri­ously, their Eng­lish is not “ques­tion­able.” It’s just as legit as the Eng­lish you or I speak. It just hap­pens to be a dialect spo­ken largely by black peo­ple. If you or I gave an extem­pore inter­view that was tran­scribed unedited, word for word, our aca­d­e­mic, ivory tower Eng­lish would be just as hard to follow–and would prob­a­bly con­tain far more “poor particles.”

    2. Avi: Nice turn around from your “their lyrics are too ridicu­lous to be taken seri­ously” argu­ment. Come on, every human being is self-aware. The fact that what they say here sat­is­fies you as a jus­ti­fi­ca­tion of their misog­yny only shows that your expec­ta­tions were low to begin with.

    • Aaron says:

      Re: y10’s self right­eous wig out. i was refer­ring to the “um’s” and “er’s” that were tran­scribed. If the author was inter­view­ing some­one they respected, I’m sure they wouldn’t find it nec­es­sary to be like “i think my music is urm..uh..uh..uh…uh…poignant” The would prob­a­bly just say “I think my music is poignant.” I just thought it was frus­trat­ing because it felt like an unfair rep­re­sen­ta­tion for a pur­pose. Also, no need to wig, I wasn’t try­ing to assert my “ivory tower” stan­dards. But glad your ready on the trig­ger in case some racists roll through this chat board.

  11. Cristina says:

    Great inter­view, Annie! I really can’t think of any­one who could have done it better.

  12. '11 says:

    I thought this was a provoca­tive joke until i read the comments.

  13. Max Brown says:

    I fail to under­stand how the Twins lyrics are more offen­sive or degrad­ing for women than the fact that thou­sands of strip clubs exist in this coun­try. And from Annie’s (let’s be hon­est, totally bull­shit) response that she would have no prob­lem with dat­ing a male strip­per even though she has never even been to a strip club, it seems to me like Annie, and per­haps by exten­sion Yale fem­i­nists, has no prob­lem with women strip­ping at all. If these songs are about and for strip­pers, and y’all are so down with strip­ping, what is the prob­lem exactly?

    As for the inter­view in gen­eral, “Really?” above is correct.

    –Max Brown is a senior in Yale College.

    • Hmm says:

      This was an inter­view con­ducted and tran­scribed entirely by one per­son. Extend­ing her to rep­re­sent Yale fem­i­nists as a group (an attempt that is itself offen­sively sim­plis­tic) is absurdly unfounded.

  14. Really? says:

    Y10, you are absolutely right that there’s noth­ing wrong with acknowl­edg­ing the dialect and thus tran­scrib­ing the inter­view as it was spo­ken. How­ever, the author did not do this. Since we acknowl­edge that this dialect exists, let’s acknowl­edge that words like “noth­ing” or “some­thing” or “moth­er­fuck­ers” are not said as such. They are likely to be “nut­tin” or “sumtin” or “moth­a­fuckas.” I urge you to watch inter­views with the Twins and see that this is the case. Thus, the point is not that the inter­view was tran­scribed with the Ying Yang dialect in mind, but that only cer­tain words were cho­sen to be tran­scribed as such, one of those being “ax” instead of “ask.” This is a method of edi­to­ri­al­iz­ing, choos­ing what the reader should get out of this inter­view, and a slant, rather than a straight tran­scrib­ing and acknowl­edg­ing of the dialect at hand.

    Also, no one is debat­ing that they were eat­ing Popeye’s. I just won­der whether if the food was any­thing else, per­haps Basil Noo­dles, Bull­dog Bur­rito, or Sub­way, if that lit­tle fact would have made it into the story, as it never really comes up again, is not really a per­ti­nent part of the piece, and is just a pass­ing obser­va­tion. The men­tion of Popeye’s is sup­posed to drive the reader into a cer­tain frame of mind, which the author should really think about.

  15. Bad interviewer says:

    I think the title of the inter­view more than any­thing else proves the unfor­tu­nate slant with which the interviewer/author went into this — she very much wants peo­ple to have a vis­ceral reac­tion against them with­out giv­ing them a chance. Fur­ther­more, I agree with pre­vi­ous posts that it has tinges of racism con­sid­er­ing the parts of their slang that the inter­viewer chose to empha­size while gloss­ing over other parts of their dialect that would not empha­size race. Also, “to mate with?”…um.…who uses the word “mate” out­side of ani­mal con­texts? How about “marry” or “date” or if you just meant to have sex with, then say “What is your ideal woman sex­u­ally”? Very ques­tion­able on the race issue. Addi­tion­ally I’m with Avi in that although the author’s clear intent is to make the Ying Yang Twins seem stu­pid and hor­ri­ble, I actu­ally think this arti­cle human­izes them. Just because I don’t nec­es­sar­ily agree with the moral­ity of their lifestyle doesn’t mean that it doesn’t have some his­tor­i­cal and cul­tural rel­e­vance, and this arti­cle actu­ally con­tex­tu­al­izes their music (I didn’t know that they started out as strip club hype music, and while I’m not fond of strip clubs, that does add rel­e­vant con­text, a lifestyle that is a real­ity for a lot of peo­ple in this nation, espe­cially if they didn’t go to col­lege). Sure there may be some con­tra­dic­tions in their life phi­los­o­phy, but I’m pretty sure you can find LOTS of con­tra­dic­tions in the fem­i­nist doctrine.…so act­ing all high and mighty towards them is pretty condescending.

  16. true dat says:

    Hon­est. Nec­es­sary. Thought­ful. Inter­est­ing. Pro­fes­sional. Thank You Annie.

    Annie ain’t a hater.

  17. Ella says:

    This is a ter­ri­ble interview/article. Racist, slanted, and your responses Annie…

    I wont re-iterate what “Really?” said, all of which was on point. How­ever, I will request the edi­tors of this esteemed online mag­a­zine to kindly not let writ­ers run amok with sen­sa­tion­al­ist headlines/descriptions and poor jour­nal­ism ethics in the name of fem­i­nism. Or Yale. Or humanity.

    I mean, “Yang was on the couch in the fetal posi­tion; he par­tic­i­pated in the first part of the inter­view supine.”

    Really??

  18. Too awesome says:

    I can’t under­stand the hate in the com­ments sec­tion. This shit is hilar­i­ous. Let the Ying Yang Twins shine through as themselves.

  19. chiiiiillll says:

    agree with Too Awe­some. Beyond the ax issue (which I agree with Really on) and the rapper’s bla­tant sex­ism, this inter­view was funny, let the Ying Yang twins be them­selves, and pushed them on some stuff. That’s the mark of a good inter­view. Like most things, peo­ple see what they want in the Ying Yang twins and in this arti­cle. I got what I wanted: mildly offen­sive absur­dity. Con­sider me a sat­is­fied customer.

  20. Colin Watson says:

    This is a good rep­re­sen­ta­tion of what hap­pens when “edu­cated” peo­ple inter­act with “une­d­u­cated” peo­ple. I don’t think there was a slant. I don’t think there was edi­to­ri­al­iz­ing. I don’t think there was any attempt to make Ying Yang look stu­pid. I wasn’t there so read­ing the tran­script isn’t enough to under­stand the tone of the interview.

    This was a text­book exam­ple of when worlds that don’t under­stand each other col­lide. Most of us here at Yale don’t under­stand where Ying Yang comes from. Annie can objec­tively not like what they say about women. Annie can dis­agree with them. THAT DOESN’T MAKE ANNIE RACIST. Or any­one else for that mat­ter. But it doesn’t mean Ying Yang is stu­pid, or Yalies are racist. It just means we don’t (and prob­a­bly will never under­stand) the world that D-Roc and Kaine live in.

  21. Really? says:

    No one said that Annie is racist because she doesn’t agree with Ying Yang.…no one.

  22. Yale '09 says:

    As you navel-gazers fret about the dilem­mas of peo­ple with cor­rect gram­mer inter­view­ing peo­ple with incor­rect gram­mar, you would do well to remem­ber that the point of Spring Fling over the past few years (with the excep­tion of 2009) has essen­tially been role rever­sal. Highly-educated Yale stu­dents get to sing along to musi­cians who are mak­ing music that ends up empha­siz­ing the class dif­fer­ence between audi­ence and per­former. The Ying Yang Twins’ com­ments give a good exam­ple of this: they’re mak­ing music for strip­pers to dance to, music that has noth­ing to do with Yalies and even less to say to them. It’s a joke on both sides, a big mardi-gras when the kings play pau­pers for a day: egg-head Yalies wave their hands around to state­ments that would hor­rify them if spo­ken by their peers (any­one remem­ber Ludacris ask­ing the ladies in the audi­ence with “clean pussies” to iden­tify them­selves, or T.I. jeer­ing at the crowd?), and the per­form­ers get to have the last laugh, because Yalies lower their stan­dards to accom­mo­date them: they pan­der, they con­de­scend. Avinash Gandhi is the biggest pan­derer of ‘em all: do adults need to be con­grat­u­lated for being “self-aware?” Avinash, you sound relieved that the Twins could speak in com­plete sen­tences. Wouldn’t want your jesters to embar­rass you too much, ‘eh?

    Those of you who are hung up over ques­tions of race and class are absolutely jus­ti­fied, but you’re miss­ing the tar­get. It isn’t Annie at all (what was she sup­posed to do, speak with bro­ken gram­mar just because her sub­jects did, or re-write their phrases in com­plete sen­tences? That they speak with bro­ken gram­mar is part of the point). It’s Yale, it’s all of you who con­grat­u­late your­selves on lis­ten­ing to rap in the first place, as if you’re break­ing a cul­tural bar­rier. You’re all proud for see­ing “how the other half lives.”

    Avinash, final ques­tion: is the ambigu­ous “wis­dom” that you spoke of the fact that “that shit”–homosexuality–“is a no-go” with the musi­cians you’re so intent on defend­ing? All of you who are pick­ing over the spelling of “ax” and “ask” are hilar­i­ous. You’re not both­ered by the ardent homo­pho­bia, the defense of vio­lence against women as edu­ca­tional for women. You’re obsessed with call­ing Yalies out for any slight offense they might give because you hold them to a higher stan­dard than the Ying Yang Twins. Dou­ble stan­dards. Pathetic.

  23. 2011 says:

    every­one is oper­at­ing under the assump­tion that annie is a racist white girl. maybe annie is black. who knows? maybe you should exam­ine your own white solop­sism, haters leav­ing comments.

    the ying yang twins said some insight­ful things and some shock­ingly mysog­y­nis­tic things. if you’ve read any unedited inter­view, you will know that inter­view­ers always leave in the ums. great interview.

  24. Some Points says:

    First, I’m not sure why lan­guage is an issue. It’s an unedited piece. The “um’s” and “er’s” were a bit much, but Annie was true to the form of the inter­view. We wouldn’t be dis­cussing this if it had been a filmed inter­view. They would have made asses of them­selves with­out Annie’s help. Sec­ond, why is every­one so quick to vil­ify strip­ping? Yes, some women are forced to do it because they don’t have the same oppor­tu­ni­ties as Yale-goers, but some do it because they want to. And don’t pull the exploita­tion thing on me. Unless you work for your­self, some­one is exploit­ing your labor. That’s right, you are a breed of ho! Per­haps they enjoy the atten­tion or (who’d a thunk) the money! Con­trary to pop­u­lar assump­tion, I’m sure there are some strip­pers out there who respect them­selves and demand respect from oth­ers. It’s clear from this inter­view that the infa­mous duo despite their we-want-to-inspire-strippers-by-rapping-about-cracking-their-jaws atti­tude doesn’t hold strip­pers in high esteem. Third, depict­ing two mediocre rap­pers as they are does not make some­one racist. Though I do know Annie per­son­ally and I sus­pect she’s not as tol­er­ant of diver­sity as she acts. That’s said with love.

Leave a Comment

Latest Tweet from @yalebroads

kotex takes on every tampon ad, ever http://bit.ly/aPRLMw 1 week ago


Follow yalebroads on Twitter



Most Popular